Legal Opinion

Conn v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The first assignment of error relates to the ruling of the court on plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s second separate answer and defense, wherein the judgment of the trial court in a former action was pleaded as a bar.

Turning to our Code, we read:

“A judgment of nonsuit may be given against the plaintiff * * * on motion of the defendant * * * when, upon the trial, the plaintiff fails to prove a cause sufficient to be submitted to the jury”: Oregon Code 1930, § 2-1001.

It further provides:

‘‘When a judgment of nonsuit is given, the action is dismissed; but such judgment shall not have the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Robison v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fann v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SPENCE, ADM'X v. RasmussenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Van Zandt v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Andersen v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Polly v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Doty v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API