Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé R.R.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1894No. 19198PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.—

This action was brought to recover from defendant, a corporation and a common carrier, damages sustained by plaintiff by reason of the alleged failure of defendant to transport from Kansas City, Missouri, to San Diego, California, and deliver to the plaintiff, within a reasonable time, five carloads of furniture. Plaintiff had a verdict for one thousand dollars, upon which judgment was entered. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

Plaintiff’s recovery was founded upon the second count of his complaint. To this a demurrer was interposed which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. W. A. Ryan & Co. v. M., K. & T. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Fonseca v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. OlveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Hutchings, Sealy & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Meuer v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
  5. Daoust v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API