Legal Opinion

Field v. Otero Et Ux.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1927No. 3107PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alfredo J. Otero and Candelaria Otero are husband and wife. The appellee on November 19, 1924, obtined a decree against the husband in a suit brought to foreclose a lien on shares of corporate stock. On December 24, 1924, the husband filed for record a deed from him to his wife conveying

[1] 27CJ p. 639 n. 23. [2] 27CJ p. 770 n. 64. the land in controversy in this action. On December 29, 1924, appellee recovered a deficiency judgment against the husband, and on January 13, 1925, recorded a transcript of the same in the proper office. On February 5, 1925, appellee took out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Nevers v. HackIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. First National Bank v. McClellanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ilfeld v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lumpkins v. McPheeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Marchbanks v. McCulloughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hartzell v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Terrace Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API