Field v. Otero Et Ux.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alfredo J. Otero and Candelaria Otero are husband and wife. The appellee on November 19, 1924, obtined a decree against the husband in a suit brought to foreclose a lien on shares of corporate stock. On December 24, 1924, the husband filed for record a deed from him to his wife conveying
[1] 27CJ p. 639 n. 23. [2] 27CJ p. 770 n. 64. the land in controversy in this action. On December 29, 1924, appellee recovered a deficiency judgment against the husband, and on January 13, 1925, recorded a transcript of the same in the proper office. On February 5, 1925, appellee took out…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Nevers v. HackIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- First National Bank v. McClellanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1899
- Ilfeld v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lumpkins v. McPheeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Marchbanks v. McCulloughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Hartzell v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Terrace Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.