Flynn v. Bredbeck
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Seeking a reversal of the judgment below, appellants contend that the word “heirs” in the phrase “their heirs and assigns forever,” used in item six of the will of Pauline E. Rehberg, is a word of limitation; that although Section 10504-73, General Code, provides for a substitution of devisees under described conditions, it does not by operation of law or otherwise pass or give any property to the substituted devisee; that the will and not the statute passes or gives the property to the substituted devisee; that Carrie Huber and not Florence Bredbeck acquired the right under Section 10504-73,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cochrel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- McDougle v. AllnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hartwell v. TefftSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1896
- Davis v. McCorkleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- O'Connell v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hoellinger v. MolzhonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Ohio Citizens Bank v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Blackwell v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Wendell v. AmeriTrust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Tootle v. TootleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.