Condit v. Bodding
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This action was started by Elvin C. Condit in October, 1929, against A. Neppach and Thomas Mannix as defendants, to recover general and punitive damages for alleged conspiracy on the part of the defendants to ruin plaintiff’s business. Trial of the case was not had until May 31, 1933. In the interim both defendants died and Hazel Bodding, executrix of the estate of A. Neppach, deceased, was substituted for her decedent as defendant. No substitution was made for the late Mr. Mannix.
On the trial the matter of punitive damages was eliminated. Judgment for general damages was entered for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wheelwright v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Kaller v. SpadyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Brown v. SiemensOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Blair v. McCoolOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Budd v. Multnomah Street Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Amort v. TupperOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- United Finance Co. v. KliksOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Carte v. Flury Buick-Jeep, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.