Legal Opinion

Amort v. Tupper

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1955PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPebby, J.

The plaintiff commenced a suit against the defendant to foreclose a chattel mortgage upon personal property situated in Clackamas county, Oregon, which mortgage was given to the plaintiff by the defendant to secure a promissory note in the original sum of $7,000.

The defendant admits the execution and delivery of the note and the chattel mortgage. He defends on the grounds of want of consideration and fraud, alleging that the note and mortgage arose out of a transaction whereby he purchased from the plaintiff 11 shares of stock in the Contractors Supply Company, an Oregon corporation, for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Schiffer v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Schuler Et Ux. v. Humphrey Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Redden v. Discount Fabrics, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bridgmon v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Keller v. LONSDALE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. McDonald v. Sun Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API