Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1931No. Docket No. 2082PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Defendant was accused by information of the crimes of rape and incest. The first four counts charged him with rape committed upon the person of a daughter then sixteen years of age, and counts 9 to 12, inclusive, charged the same acts as incest. Counts 5 to 8 charged defendant with rape committed upon the person of another daughter, of the age of fourteen years, all of said acts having occurred on and between September 1, 1928, and August 14, 1929. The jury returned verdicts of guilty on each of the sixteen counts on February 13, 1931, and defendant having also entered a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. TrocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. StrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. DickersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. VaughanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. People v. SmittcampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. McDonoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. McDonoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. AgullanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API