State v. . Pritchard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe record reveals an unusual proceeding — manifestly difficult to conduct. Tbe defendant insisted on trying bis own case, which be bad a right to do under tbe statute. G. S., 1-11. He proved to be a poor lawyer and an unwise client. After conviction, be employed counsel to prosecute an appeal. This has been done with as much skill as tbe record would permit.
It appears that tbe defendant took tbe witness stand and admitted tbe publication and circulation of tbe reports as alleged in tbe warrant. They are derogatory on their face. Tbe jury found that they were false and were circulated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Morgan v. Royal Benefit Society & Royal Fraternal Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Midgett v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Gibbs v. . RussSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. PhillipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sheffer v. RardinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.