Legal Opinion

Bank of Enoree v. Yarborough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1922No. 10946PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Four actions were commenced against, the defendants, two by the Bank of Enoree and two by Woodruff Oil & Fertilizer Company, upon certain notes. They were tried together on Circuit, and the appeals were heard together in this Court. The same questions arise in all of the cases, and they will be discussed and determined in connection with the first cause of action alleged in the complaint of the Bank of Enoree against John Yarborough and others, the decision being determinative of the issues in all of the cases.

The appeal is from an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Nelson Bennett Co. v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Blackwell v. British American Mtg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Hankinson v. Charlotte &c. R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  5. Montgomery v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mullins Hospital v. SquiresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. Finance Co. v. . HendrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. S. N. Aroneck and Arrow Investment Corporation v. Henry Sims Securities, Inc., Third Party Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. S. N. Aroneck and Arrow Investment Corporation v. Henry Sims Securities, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API