United States v. Dae Rim Fishery Company, Ltd., and Britannia Steamship Insurance Association, Ltd., in Personam
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The United States filed a complaint for recovery of oil pollution removal costs pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 1 On summary judgment, the dis trict court held the government’s suit barred for failure to file within the three-year statute of limitations prescribed for government tort claims. We reverse and hold that cost recovery actions under the Act are governed by the six-year statute of limitations for government contract claims, and, alternatively, that the government’s suit was timely filed even for purposes of a three-year statute of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. City of Redwood City, California and Albert v. Pinotti, Individually and Dba the People's Police PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Raul Loya v. Desert Sands Unified School District, a Governmental Agency & Harold SchoenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Samuel Neidorf and Maria Glickman, of the Estate of Mannes n.glickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Lee A. Limbs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Joseph Raymond Cintron v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Jack C. Smith v. Anthony M. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.