Legal Opinion

Dishian v. Kishishian

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1923No. Civ. No. 2685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. W. B. Wallace, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Plaintiff sued to recover the amount of a promissory note given him by defendant. The defendant was given judgment for costs and plaintiff appeals.

February 16, 1921, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement by the terms of which the former agreed to sell certain real property to the latter for the sum of $10,250, as follows: “$1000 upon the execution of this agreement, the sum of $2000 on or before November 21, 1921, the payment of which shall be represented by a promissory note in the words and figures following”: Then follows a copy of the promissory note. The other deferred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glassell v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McCroskey v. LaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bramwell Inv. Co. v. Uggla Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Yakoobian v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Hovsepian v. EskenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. California Raisin Pool v. BalianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API