State v. Stout
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶ 1. The first question is whether the police entry into the apartment in this case can be justified under the Terry 1 doctrine where the statute and case law specify that the doctrine only applies to police-citizen confrontations in a public place. We hold that the doctrine only applies to stops made in a public place and police may not enter an abode based on Terry. The second issue is whether police must first have reasonable suspicion that someone inside a dwelling has committed a crime as a condition precedent to asking the owner for consent to enter and search the premises. We hold that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. St. GermaineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- State v. KainCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
- State v. MicklevitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.