Legal Opinion
State v. St. Germaine
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 14, 2007No. 2006AP2555-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURLEY, PJ.
¶ 1. Roemie T. St. Germaine appeals from the judgment of conviction entered after he pled no contest to one count of manufacture of more than four but less than twenty plants containing tet-rahydrocannabinols (marijuana), contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.14(4)(t) and 961.41(l)(h)2. (2001-02). St. Ger-maine contends that in denying his motion to suppress evidence that police discovered after a warrantless entry into a room that he was renting, the trial court incorrectly concluded that the officers' entry was lawful. Because we conclude that there was valid consent for the warrantless…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Boland, Ca2007-01-016 (2-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Bobby L. TateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Bobby L. TateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Derik J. WantlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Derik J. WantlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.