Legal Opinion

Reed v. Bott

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1889PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Scotland Circuit Court.—Hon. B. E. Turner, Judge. (1) All of the evidence of the plaintiff was introduced upon the hypothesis and for the purpose of showing that John A. Bott purchased the lands, paid for them with his own money, that the title bond was made to him, that he was the obligee therein, that the name inserted therein was the name of the defendant, John A. Bott, and not the name of his father, John Bott, that the note was the note of John A. Bott, the…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Scotland Circuit Court.—Hon. B. E. Turner, Judge. (1) All of the evidence of the plaintiff was introduced upon the hypothesis and for the purpose of showing that John A. Bott purchased the lands, paid for them with his own money, that the title bond was made to him, that he was the obligee therein, that the name inserted therein was the name of the defendant, John A. Bott, and not the name of his father, John Bott, that the note was the note of John A. Bott, the defendant, and not the note of his father, John Bott, that the defendant, John A. Bott, paid the note and not his…

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

This is a suit in equity against John A. Bott and his wife, Mary E., to have a deed for seventy-three acres of land to her declared fraudulent, and to vest the title in the plaintiff.

The plaintiff purchased the property in 1885, under a judgment in favor of Max. Yesner against John A. Bott, rendered in March, 1884, on a note dated in March, 1882. The defendants appealed from a decree in favor of the plaintiff.

The first objection made by defendants is that the proof does not support the cause of action stated in the petition. The petition states that on the-day of -,‘1881, defendant John A.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newham v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Smith v. SimsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Baldwin v. WhaleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Friedel v. BaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Nichols v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Central National Bank v. DoranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Coleman v. HageySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API