Legal Opinion

Rusco v. DeGood

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1929No. 28,323PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy involves the question whether a deed was in fact a mortgage. The action was one for possession of a ranch (840 acres) in Cheyenne county. It was brought by George S. Rusco, claiming to be owner and landlord, against L. D. Reinhold, tenant, and against J. W. Dorsey DeGood, to have a deed purporting to convey the ranch to the latter, declared to be a mortgage. Reinhold answered denying the landlord’s title, admitting nonpayment of rent under a lease through which he held, and claiming that DeGood was the owner of the ranch…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. Union National Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Rowan v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Fabrique v. Cherokee & Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Walker v. EckhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cities Service Co. v. KoenekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Benson v. RosebaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Stockham v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Berger v. BierschbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Republic Mutual Fire Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API