Legal Opinion

Walker v. Eckhardt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 27,064PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one to recover damages for breach of a pasturage contract. The plaintiff, who lived in Pawhuska, Olda., was extensively engaged in the cattle business. The defendant, who lived in Viroqua, Wis., owned what was known as the Ohio ranch, sixteen miles east of Arkansas City, in Cowley county. H. H. Rice represented the plaintiff in certain negotiations for the rental of the Ohio ranch for the summer season of 1923. His father, H. J. Rice, had for some years previous had charge of the Ohio ranch for the defendant. The questions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowan v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Wilson v. HaunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Banks v. EverestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Mitchell v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Prewett v. ShollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Rezac Livestock Commission Co. v. Pinnacle BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
  4. Clark v. Linley Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Harry M. Washington, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Houston Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API