Legal Opinion

Rubin v. A. C. Kluger & Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 14, 1976Published

1Opinion of the CourtFelice K. Shea, J.

In this action to recover legal fees for services rendered to A. C. Kluger & Co., a limited partnership, plaintiff named 13 defendants (the partnership and 12 general partners) in his summons, but effected service only upon A. C. Kluger & Co., Alan C. Kluger, Donald H. Moskin and Stanley Slobodien; A. C. Kluger & Co. and Alan C. Kluger defaulted. Moskin and Slobodien served an answer by mail on plaintiff and on eight codefendants containing a cross claim for contribution and/or indemnification. Thereafter, upon learning that plaintiff had served only four of the named defendants, Mos-kin and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scanlon v. KuehnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Siskind v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Gates v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Boyce Hardware Co. v. SaundersNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API