Gates v. . Beecher
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The general cross-interrogatory must be answered as well as the particular ones, and if it is not put and answered the deposition taken on commission will, in general, be suppressed. (Kimball v. Davis, 19 Wend., 437.) The reason given for this requirement is this, that unless it is done, it is impossible to say that the witness has told the whole truth. (S.C. in error, 25 Wend., 259, 268.)
In the case before us, as appears from the printed book, there were sixteen cross-interrogatories, the sixteenth being the general one. They were, beyond doubt, answered seriatim up to and including the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Van Keuren v. . ParmeleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Kimball & Rowe v. Davis & BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Youngs v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Robbins v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Brown v. KimballNew York Supreme Court · 1840
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shutts v. . FingarNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Cotten v. Perishable Air ConditionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Belanger v. DanaNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- In re the Arbitration between Perkins & Will Partnership & Syska & HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- The Cayuga County Bank v. . WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.