State v. Walker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Defendants assign as error the denial of their motions for separate trials and the allowance of the State’s motion to consolidate all cases against both defendants for purposes of trial. The two defendants were charged in separate bills of indictment with identical crimes. The offenses charged were so connected and tied together in time, place, and circumstances as to make one continuous criminal episode. In such cases there is statutory authority for a consolidation. G.S. 15-152; State v. Hamilton, 264 N.C. 277, 141 S.E. 2d 506. Moreover, the motions were addressed to the sound discretion of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. KeittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.