Legal Opinion

Grattan v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 27, 1927No. 11,651PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The defendants in error obtained a decree canceling certain promissory notes, and restraining the plaintiff in error from foreclosing a deed of trust given to secure the payment of the notes.

On April 23, 1924, Grattan sold to the Wilsons the furniture and other personal property in the Carlton Hotel, in Denver, together with a lease of the premises. No cash was paid to Grattan; but the Wilsons assumed an indebtedness of Grattan’s, secured by a chattel mortgage of the property, and gave their promissory notes, payable monthly, for the balance, and secured them by a second chattel mortgage.'…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mohr v. LanganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Hurt v. HubbardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Thornton v. SchobeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Sorrells v. Sigel-Campion Live-Stock Commission Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. First National Bank v. WilburSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zoning Board of Adjustment v. DeVilbissSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Mayer v. Chelten Avenue Building Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Steele v. Marlborough Hall Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Werner v. NordenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Roberts v. MooneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API