Legal Opinion

Allman v. Rich

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1926No. Docket No. 5282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Morris Allman and Bernard Altman commenced this action to impress a trust on certain real property alleged to have been purchased by the defendant with funds furnished by the plaintiffs. Morris Allman has since deceased and the action has been prosecuted by his administrator. Judgment went for the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appeals on typewritten transcripts.

In their complaint the plaintiffs alleged that on October 5, 1920, each of the plaintiffs entered into a contract in writing with the defendant in the same form, substance, and tenor by which it was agreed that the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Reymond v. LaboudigueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Santa Rosa Bank v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boulenger v. MorisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Forbes v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Wood v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Watson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API