Legal Opinion
Satterfield v. Malone
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtAci-ieson, J.
This bill is in aid of an action of ejectment pending in this court, brought by the plaintiff, John Satterfield, against H. P. Malone, and Emma E. Malone, his wife, two of the defendants herein, for the recovery of certain oil-producing lands situate in McKean county, Pa. The real parties to the controversy are the plaintiff and Mrs. Emma E. Malone, each of whom claims title to the lands under George A. Baker, who owned' them in fee. By his two deeds, purporting to convey an indefeasible title in foe-simple, dated and acknowledged November 20, 1880, and duly recorded in McKean county on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Woods v. FarmereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Vigel v. HoppSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Kerns v. SwopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Morrison v. DurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Bank of Morton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Eversole v. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Alfred H. Wagg Corp. v. F. L. Stitt Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Roy E. Hays Co. v. PiersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Geo. Washington Fire Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928