Legal Opinion · Dissent

Geo. Washington Fire Ins. Co. v. Adams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 19, 1928No. 12547Published

1DissentJustice Coti-iran

(dissenting) : It is a conceded fact in this case that, upon a stock of goods and fixtures, sworn by the insured to have been of the value of $3,654.89 (mark the exact figures in dollars and cents), the insured was carrying insurance to the amount of $7,500.

It is also a conceded fact that, in the proofs of loss relating to the particular policy in question, the insured made an affidavit, in order to collect the $3,000, “that the total insurance covering, at the time of said fire, in whole or in part, on any of the within described and insured property, including the above and all other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Bacot v. South Carolina Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Blowers v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  4. Satterfield v. MaloneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API