Legal Opinion

Roy E. Hays Co. v. Pierson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925No. 1167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

This is an action brought by W. S. Pierson and Dorothy Pierson, plaintiffs below and defendants in error here, against Roy E. Hays & Co., The Riverton State Bank, and another. The object of the action was, in brief, to have the court cancel certain mortgages given by Fred Primm to defendants in error on Lot 16 in Sec. 2 and Lots 13 and 14 in Section 10, T. 1 S. of R. 4e, Fremont County, Wyoming, to enjoin the attempted foreclosure under one of said mortgages, to declare said land to be the property of the partnership of Lawrence & Primm, and to subject it to the payment of a…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. LOUISA & MARIA SETONSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Loring v. BrodieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Constant v. . University of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. National Security Bank v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Casco National Bank of Portland v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Choman v. EpperleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Larry Warwick and Gregory Gilbert v. Accessible Space, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API