Legal Opinion

Espinosa v. Rusk

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1980No. 79-1477PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

The issue before us is whether an ordinance of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, as applied to the plaintiffs, violates the first and fourteenth amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The ordinance involves licensing and regulation of solicitation carried on by charitable organizations including some religious groups. The ordinance is numbered 72-1955.

The Seventh Day Adventist Church challenges the application of the ordinance to its annual solicitation drive in Albuquerque. The drive is known as the Ingathering. The money received in the drive…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Catholic Charities of Sacramento, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Association Of Community Organizations For Reform Now v. Municipality Of GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Lieutenant Mary Ogden v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Lanner v. WimmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Rainbow FamilyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API