Catholic Charities of Sacramento, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In this case, we address a church-affiliated employer’s constitutional challenges to the Women’s Contraception Equity Act (WCEA),1 under which certain health and disability insurance contracts must cover prescription contraceptives. The plaintiff employer, which opposes contraceptives on religious grounds, claims the statute violates the establishment and free exercise clauses of the United States and California Constitutions. (U.S. Const., 1st Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 4.) The lower courts rejected the employer’s claims. We affirm.
I. Facts
The Legislature enacted the…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Naoko Ohno v. Yuko YasumaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.