Legal Opinion
White v. Quisenberry
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 25, 1953No. 8108PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, District Judge.
This is an action for assault and battery, wherein plaintiff seeks recovery against the above-named defendants, individually, and as representatives of the full membership of Local Union No. 955, Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Drivers, A. F. of L. (or, more correctly, Local Union No. 955, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, A. F. of L.), an unincorporated labor association. The assault and battery is alleged to have been committed by the individual defendants while acting within the due course and scope of their employment,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LangerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Robinson v. NickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Allai v. ThatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Clarkson v. LaiblanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Inf. Ashcroft v. Kansas City Firefighters Local No. 42Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Morris v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Gregory Oskoian, Etc. v. Theobald J. Canuel, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Canuel v. OskoianDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Local No. 612 International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.