Legal Opinion · Dissent

A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 1, 1962No. 66724; protests 60/30748, etc. (Boston)Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Mollison, Judge:

In addition to the matters set forth in my dissenting opinion in the case of Interim, Inc. v. United States, reported in Abstract 65150, I would like to make additional observations about the matter involved in this case.

The question here involved is not the substantive law or question whether duties must be paid by a protestant, but rather the procedure which must be followed by the court in the consideration of a motion to dismiss proceedings where a motion to dismiss has been made, but which motion has not been supported by an affidavit setting up facts.

As…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Terre Haute Gas Corporation v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. United States v. WarringtonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  4. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Tower v. Detroit & Milwaukee RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API