Legal Opinion
United States v. Warrington
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 18, 1955No. Cr. No. 11263PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge.
The defendant has filpd a written motion for return of seized property and suppression of evidence which involves numerous items of personal property specifically described in the motion. Defendant asserts in his motion “that the property was seized against his will and without a search warrant”. Defendant has also filed an affidavit in support of his motion to suppress evidence. In his affidavit, defendant sets forth in considerable detail his version of the circumstances surrounding the alleged search for and the seizure of the property. The matter came on regularly…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wall v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Rawls v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Lotto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. DanielsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Oscar ArboledaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Chin Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Franklin R. Masiello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Albert Samuel WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.