Legal Opinion

McCoy v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1996No. 21664PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilak, Justice

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant Michael C. McCoy’s petition for post-conviction relief in which he alleges that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to conflict-free counsel. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Michael C. McCoy (McCoy) and his co-defendant, Danny Gillette (Gillette) were originally charged with one count of Grand Theft, one count of Kidnapping and one count of Robbery. These charges arose out of the abduction of a car salesman in Pocatello, Jason Rainey (Rainey), under the pretense that McCoy and Gillette wanted to test…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DeRushé v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Grube v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API