McCoy v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSilak, Justice
This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant Michael C. McCoy’s petition for post-conviction relief in which he alleges that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to conflict-free counsel. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant Michael C. McCoy (McCoy) and his co-defendant, Danny Gillette (Gillette) were originally charged with one count of Grand Theft, one count of Kidnapping and one count of Robbery. These charges arose out of the abduction of a car salesman in Pocatello, Jason Rainey (Rainey), under the pretense that McCoy and Gillette wanted to test…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DeRushé v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Grube v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.