Legal Opinion
United States v. Sacramento Hinojosa-Perez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 2000No. 98-30304PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Sacramento Hinojosa-Perez (“Hinojo-sa”) appeals his felony conviction for reentering the country after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The threshold and dispositive issue in this case is whether Hinojosa’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies available to challenge his underlying order of deportation precludes him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) from collaterally attacking the order in this case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1294. We hold that his administrative failure is fatal to his challenge, and we affirm the district court.
I
Backgrou…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Estrada-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Raul Estrada-TrochezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Herta Wittgenstein, Also Known as Herta Hilscher, Also Known as Herta ChristiensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Evelyn Victoria Zapon v. U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Jose Jesus Camacho-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Arias-OrdonezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Encarnacion Gonzalez-VillaloboCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Wilfredo Antonio ZelayaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Arita-CamposCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.