Legal Opinion
United States v. Robertson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 23, 1994No. Nos. 93-50194, 93-50195PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
Dominick Lee Robertson claims the government breached a plea agreement, which contained a waiver of his right to appeal. Because of the breach, Robertson argues he retains the right to appeal. He asks us to vacate his sentence and order the government to comply with the terms of the agreement. Robertson failed to object in district court to the government’s conduct which he now claims is a breach. Because Robertson failed to raise the breach of the plea agreement in district court, we will not consider his claims of breach for the first time on appeal. The waiver of his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence ShimelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Eric J. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Sergio Rafael GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Thomas J. Hard v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Gilberto Pimentel-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco AGUILAR-MUNIZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Alexander Montagu HayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- FreecycleSunnyvale v. Freecycle NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Louis Schneider v. County of San Diego, and Reybro, Inc., a California Corporation, Dba, Quality Auto RecyclingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.