Legal Opinion

United States v. Herta Wittgenstein, Also Known as Herta Hilscher, Also Known as Herta Christiensen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 16, 1998No. 97-2379PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Herta Wittgenstein appeals from her conviction of having been found in the United States without permission of the Attorney General after prior arrest and deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1994). We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

Background

Ms. Wittgenstein, a native and citizen of Austria, has resided in the United States since August 13, 1964, when she entered as a non-immigrant visitor. For the bulk of these years, she has lived here illegally. Not until April 13, 1992, did an immigration judge grant her status as…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. Pablo Fernandez-Antonia, AKA "Pablo Fernandez"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Thao Dinh LeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Jurado-Gutierrez v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. BashamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API