Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Amster
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1992PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bellacosa, J.
Appellant Doyle challenges the Clarkstown Zoning Board of Appeals’ (Board) denial of his application for area variances to allow subdivision of a 29,370-square-foot parcel of property located in New City, Rockland County, into two building plots. We affirm the order of the Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, on transfer from the Second Department pursuant to New York Constitution, article VI, § 4 (g), because we agree with both lower courts that there is substantial record evidence supporting the Board’s determination that Doyle did not establish…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- MATTER OF FULLING v. PalumboNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Hoffman v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ifrah v. UtschigNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In the Matter of Colin Realty Co., LLC v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.