Legal Opinion
In re Goldman Sachs Mortgage Servicing Shareholder Derivative Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 14, 2012No. 11 Civ. 4544(WHP)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michael G. Brautigam (“Brautigam”) and the Retirement Relief System of the City of Birmingham, Alabama (“Alabama Retirement Relief System,” with Brautigam, “Plaintiffs”) bring this consolidated shareholder derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant The Goldman Sachs Group (“Goldman”) against current and former members of Goldman’s board of directors and other Goldman executives (“Defendants”). Defendants move to dismiss the Verified, Consolidated and Amended Shareholder Derivative Complaint (“Complaint”) in its entirety.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Ahluwalia v. St. George's University, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In re Saic Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Barnett v. Countrywide Bank, FSBDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Fouche v. St. Charles HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.