Legal Opinion

Marston v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 1992No. 91-302PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The plaintiffs, Donald and Linda Marston, appeal from a Superior Court (Dalianis, J.) order granting an amended motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G), in a declaratory judgment action. On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the superior court erred in: (1) allowing USF&G to relitigate issues of fact after its *708insured, A&E Forklift Company (A&E), had defaulted in the underlying tort action; (2) allowing USF&G to file an amended motion for summary judgment; and (3) finding that USF&G was not obligated to insure A&E under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Eastern Marine Construction Corp. v. First Southern Leasing, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Glowski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Ellis v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Stevens v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Patterson v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Stephan v. Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. White Mountain Cable Construction Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. McNair v. McNairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. Angus v. Wald (In Re Wald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API