Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Zick

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 14, 1972No. 24978PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

This is a sequel to Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners v. Dixon, 165 Colo. 488, 440 P.2d 287, decided by this court on April 29, 1968. The plain tiff-appellants here are licensed optometrists and the defendant-appellees are members of the Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners and the Board itself.

The plaintiffs filed a class action (1) to permanently enjoin the Board from enforcing Regulation No. 11 and (2) for a declaratory judgment that Regulation No. 11 is unconstitutional. The trial court, finding that irreparable injury would otherwise result to the plaintiffs, granted a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Milligan v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Swisher v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RosburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. JeffersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Massengale v. Oklahoma Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Bronstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API