Legal Opinion

Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 29, 1968No. 22626PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

This writ of error is brought to review an order of the District Court of the City and County of Denver granting a preliminary injunction restraining plaintiff in error, the Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners, from enforcing a regulation.

Plaintiff in error will hereafter be referred to as the Board, and the defendants in error, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, will be referred to as plaintiffs.

Regulation No. 11, the subject of this action, was adopted by the Board January 29, 1966. It provides: “No optometrist shall conduct the practice of his profession in or on premises…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Farley v. GraneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Rathke v. MacFarlaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Town of Crested ButteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Beacom Ex Rel. Seventeenth Judicial District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Silverstein v. Sisters of Charity of LeavenworthColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. CF&I Steel Corp. v. Colorado Air Pollution Control CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API