Legal Opinion
In Re Clayton
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 2002No. 49S00-0008-DI-493PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
Dan L. Clayton, an attorney admitted to practice law in this state in 1971, committed several acts of misconduct, which he attributes to addiction to alcohol and certain prescription drugs. Today, we suspend him from the practice of law.
The Disciplinary Commission filed a five-count complaint for disciplinary action against the respondent on August 23, 2000. A hearing officer appointed by this Court, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(b), conducted an evidentiary hearing on the charges and has now tendered to this Court his findings and…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of MartenetIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- in the Matter of Larry O. Wilder.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Matter of RaglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re HaithIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of GemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Van Buren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Cynthia Clark-Silberman v. Richard M. Silberman and Susan A. WangIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017