In Re Haith
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
Lawyer Aaron E. ’Haith was convicted twice of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and convicted once of operating a vehicle with a blood alcohol content of at least .10 percent. Today we find that, by virtue of the acts underlying those convictions, he engaged in criminal acts reflecting adversely on his fitness as a lawyer in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law.
This attorney disciplinary case is now before us for final resolution upon the duly-appointed hearing officer’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The respondent,…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of MartenetIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re WarrumIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re ClaytonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re HaithIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Matter of Patrick J. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2004