Legal Opinion

Matter of Ragland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1998No. 49S00-9608-DI-565PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Attorney Michael A. Ragland failed to adequately communicate with several clients, failed to appropriately represent their interests, and mismanaged funds he held on their behalf in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. For that misconduct, we conclude today that he should be suspended from the practice of law in this state for at least six months.

This case formally began with the Disciplinary Commission’s Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action, filed on August 21, 1996. 1 Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11, the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of RaglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re ClaytonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re RaglandIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In the Matter of ReglandIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In the Matter of Ronald Lynn DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API