Legal Opinion

Washington v. Spitzer Mgmt., Unpublished Decision (4-3-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 2003No. 81612Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Spitzer Management, Inc., Spitzer Motor Center, Inc., and Spitzer Buick, Inc. ("Spitzer") appeal from the order of the trial court certifying a class action brought by plaintiffs-appellees Lisa Washington and Carol Ann Violand, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging that Spitzer's practice of imposing a $97.50 "dealer overhead" charge in conjunction with the sale or lease of motor vehicles to consumers violates Ohio's Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA") and constitutes fraud and negligent misrepresentation.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Celebrezze v. NetzleyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State, ex rel. Overmeyer v. WalinskiOhio Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API