Legal Opinion

A3M Vacuum Services, L.L.C. v. Hub International Midwest, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided April 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 10-2766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.

Defendant Hub International Midwest, Limited (“Hub”) moves for summary judg*556ment.1 For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Hub’s motion.

I. Background

This suit stems from previous state court litigation. On September 6, 2006, Lawrence and Emma Brock sued A3M Vacuum Services, L.L.C. (“A3M”) for damages arising out of a car accident (the “Brock litigation”).2 A3M now sues Hub, its insurance agency, for failure timely to notify A3M’s excess liability insurer of the Brock litigation.3 A3M alleges that Hub’s failure to notify the excess insurer of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Nationwide Agribusiness InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
Moises Galindo v. Precision American Corp., Georgia Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

(PC) Burgess v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
Alfred Theriot v. Dwight W. Andrus Insurance, IncLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021