Legal Opinion

(PC) Burgess v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 7, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00077Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JEFFREY ALAN BURGESS, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00077-SAB (PC) 6 ) Plaintiff, ) 7 ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO 8 THIS ACTION GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., ) 9 ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION Defendants. 10 ) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF 11 ) ) (ECF No. 12) 12 13 Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Burgess is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 14 U.S.C. § 1983. 15 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API