Legal Opinion
Blankerts v. v. Gladieux Enterprises
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 12, 2002No. 3:01 CV 7205PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Beth A. Blankerts brings this action against defendant V. Gladieux Enterprises 1 claiming she was discriminated against on the basis of age and sex. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367. Pending is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). For the following reasons, defendant’s motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a 46 year old woman. Defendant hired plaintiff at age 45 to work as Director of Operations for its account with the University of Toledo. On February…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Siegfried Herrnreiter v. Chicago Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Herrnreiter, S. v. CHACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002