Legal Opinion

Ma & Pa, Inc. v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1984No. 83-174PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

This appeal involves a covenant in an employment contract prohibiting competition after termination of the employment. The action is in equity and we review de novo. Baker v. Starkey, 259 Iowa 480, 144 N.W.2d 889 (1966).

From the evidence we find the facts as follows. Russell Buchanan has had about twenty-three years experience in the petroleum business. Approximately ten years ago he established plaintiff Ma & Pa, Inc., in Oskaloosa, Iowa, to sell petroleum products and some other lines. The corporation operates mainly in central and southeast Iowa. Through work, ability,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kroeger v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Ehlers v. Iowa Warehouse CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Iowa Glass Depot, Inc. v. JindrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Economy Grocery Stores Corp. v. McMenamyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Cogley Clinic v. MartiniSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  2. Central Monitoring Service, Inc. v. ZakinskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Moore Business Forms, Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  4. Dental East, P.C. v. WestercampCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1988
  5. Rasmussen Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. IdsoCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API