Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 19, 1996No. 125PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Justice.

In this case, we are asked to interpret a separation agreement that provides for contractual spousal support. We are specifically asked to construe a clause of the agreement that terminates the husband’s obligation to pay support if “the wife resides with any unrelated man without the benefit of marriage for a period continuing for beyond sixty (60) consecutive days.” Based on our interpretation of the clause, we conclude that this language requires the husband to demonstrate that the wife established a cohabitation arrangement before he may terminate support. Because the trial…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Collier v. MD-Individual Practice Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Emerson v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. State v. KelloggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Konzelman v. KonzelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Highway Administration v. David A. Bramble, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Ricketts v. RickettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Baker v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API