Baker v. Baker
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Ralph R. Baker appealed an amendment to a divorce decree ending LaRue A. Baker’s conditional duty to pay him $300 monthly spousal support because he was “cohabiting in an informal marital relationship.” We affirm the trial court’s finding that Ralph’s cohabitation invoked the decree’s condition, and we therefore affirm the amended decree.
[¶ 2] Ralph and LaRue married in 1963 and raised two children who were adults when LaRue sought a divorce in 1992. In granting the divorce, the trial court said the “marriage was dysfunctional almost from its inception.”
[¶ 3] When…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wiege v. WiegeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Wheeler v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Rustand v. RustandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Pearson v. PearsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Walker v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.