Legal Opinion

Ormsbee v. Piper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case made from Mason; McMahon, J. Replevin by Hamilton C. Ormsbee, administrator of the estate of Erastus N. Ormsbee, deceased, against George F. Piper, executor of the last will and testament of Mary A. Ormsbee, deceased. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The finding of fact in this cause shows that Erastus N. Ormsbee died intestate on April 14, 1895, leaving an estate consisting of a team, wagon, some farming tools, and a mortgage for $1,900; also, an undivided half interest in certain lands. He owed no debts. He left surviving him a widow, Mary A., and three children, Hamilton, Charles, and Grace. All were adults, except Grace, who was a minor. A petition for administration was filed, but no hearing or other proceedings were had upon said petition at that time, for the reason that the widow (who was the legal guardian of Grace) and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. ForscheMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Foote v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Needham v. GillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Letts v. LettsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. McCleary v. MenkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrison v. LorenzMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Blackman v. MulhallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Brobst v. BrobstMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Laird v. GangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. McKana v. EnglundMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API