(PC) Santiago Pratt v. Clark
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANTIAGO PRATT, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00180-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 v. SHOULD NOT BE DENIED 14 KEN CLARK, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (Doc. 6.) 18 According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation certified account 19 statement submitted by Plaintiff, he had $9,849.47 in his inmate trust account as of December 9, 20 2020. (Doc. 2.) This is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- In re SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1932